Wu Chinese

Wu Chinese
Traditional Chinese 吳語
Simplified Chinese 吴语
Wu Wu Gniu
Wu
吳語/吴语

Wu Nyiu (Wu) written in Chinese characters
Spoken in China; and overseas Chinese in urban emigrant communities originating from Wu speaking areas of China – particularly United States (New York City)
Region Shanghai; most of Zhejiang province; southern Jiangsu province; Xuancheng prefecture-level city of Anhui province; Shangrao County, Guangfeng County and Yushan County, Jiangxi province; Pucheng County, Fujian province; North Point, Hong Kong
Ethnicity Wu (Han Chinese)
Native speakers 77 million  (1984)[1]
(no recent data available)
Language family
Dialects
Oujiang (Wenzhou)
Language codes
ISO 639-3 wuu

Wu (simplified Chinese: 吴语; traditional Chinese: 吳語; pinyin: Wú yǔ, Suzhou Wu:  [ŋ˨˦ ɲy˧˩]) is a grouping of linguistically similar and historically related varieties of the oral communication systems employed by the Han ethnicity. Wu Varieties are spoken in most of Zhejiang province, the municipality of Shanghai, southern Jiangsu province, as well as smaller parts of Anhui, Jiangxi, and Fujian provinces.[2] It is famous among linguists and sinologists as being one of the most internally diverse among the spoken Chinese language families with very little mutual intelligibility among varieties within the family.

Major Wu dialects include those of Shanghai, Suzhou, Ningbo, Wenzhou, Hangzhou, Shaoxing, Jinhua, Yongkang, and Quzhou. The prestige dialect has traditionally been that of Suzhou, though due to its large population and economic dominance, Shanghainese is now considered the prestige dialect[3] while Suzhou Wu is still widely considered to be the most linguistically representative of the family though this has been under debate in recent years. Because of the influence of Shanghainese, Wu is often inaccurately referred to in English as simply "Shanghainese" when introducing the dialect family to non-specialists. Wu is a clearly defined term used by scholars; other less precise terms include "Jiangnan speech" (江南話), "Jiangsu-Zhejiang speech" or "Jiangzhe speech" (江浙話), and less commonly "Wuyue speech" (吳越語) referring to the kingdom of Wuyue.

Among speakers of other Chinese languages, Wu is often subjectively judged to be soft, light, and flowing. There is an idiom in Chinese used to describe these qualities of Wu speech (simplified Chinese: 吴侬软语; traditional Chinese: 吳儂軟語; pinyin: wúnóngruǎnyǔ), which literally means "The Tender Language of Wu."

Contents

Names

The average speaker of a Wu dialect is mostly unaware of this name for the language they speak since the term Wu is a relatively recent classificatory imposition on what are less clearly defined and highly heterogeneous natural forms. Saying one speaks Wu is akin to saying one speaks a Germanic language. It is not a particularly defined entity like Standard Mandarin or Hochdeutsch.

Most speakers are only vaguely aware of their local language's affinities with other similarly classified dialects and will generally only refer to their local Wu variety rather than the dialect family. They do this by affixing the native pronunciation of the word '' huà to their location's endonym, with huà pronounced with the dialects xia/ initial, typically /ɦ/, often a glide /w/, and a (often rounded) back or low vowel taking tone II, tone IIb or whatever tone tone II or IIb has merged with. For example 溫州話 Wēnzhōuhuà is used for Wenzhounese. Affixing '言話' yánhuà, alternatively written 閒話 xiánhuà, is also common and more typical of the Taihu division, as in 嘉興言話 Jiāxīngyánhuà or 嘉興閒話 Jiāxīngxiánhuà for Jiaxing dialect.

History

The modern Wu language can be traced back to the ancient Wu and Yue peoples centred around what is now southern Jiangsu and northern Zhejiang. The Japanese Go-on (呉音 goon?, pinyin: Wú yīn) readings of Chinese characters (obtained from the Eastern Wu during the Three Kingdoms period) is from the same region of China where Wu is spoken today, however the readings do not necessarily reflect the pronunciation of Wu Chinese. Wu Chinese itself has a history of more than 2,500 years, dating back to the Chinese settlement of the region in the Spring and Autumn Period, however there are only very minor traces from these earlier periods. The language of today is wholly descendant from the Middle Chinese of the Sui-Tang era (6-8th centuries AD), as is true of all contemporary Chinese dialects except Min Chinese [5].

Historic Range

According to records of the Eastern Jin, the earliest known dialect of Nanjing was an ancient Wu dialect. After the Wu Hu uprising, the Jin Emperor and many northern Chinese fled south, establishing the the new capital Jiankang in what is modern day Nanjing. It was during this time that the ancient Wu of Nanjing was replaced by Jianghuai Mandarin. [6]

Origins

Like most other branches of Chinese, Wu mostly descends from Middle Chinese which more or less supplanted the pre-existing language. This language, called Old Wu-Min, was one of the earliest splits from Northern Chinese and is still preserved in the Min dialects of Fujian which also originate from this language. Wu dialects like Min retain many ancient characteristics and are considered some of the most historic dialects. Wu was however more heavily influenced by northern or Mandarin Chinese throughout its development than Min, as for example in its lenition of unreleased /k/, /t/, /p/ finals into glottal stops which also happened in the Mandarin dialects before disappearing in most others. Some Mandarin dialects especially ones farther south still possess the glottal stops while some Wu dialects have entirely lost them. Most Min dialects however completely retain the series. These developments in Wu are likely areal influences due to its geographical closeness to North China, the ease of transport with many water ways in the north, the placement of the Southern Song capital in Hangzhou, as well as to the high rate of education in this region.

As early as the time of Guo Pu (276-324), speakers easily perceived differences between dialects in different parts of China including the area where Wu dialects are spoken today.[7]

During the Wu Hu uprising and the Disaster of Yongjia in 311, the region became heavily inundated by settlers from Northern China, mostly coming from what is now northern Jiangsu province and Shandong province, with smaller numbers of settlers coming from the Central Plains. From the 300s to the 400s AD Northern people moved into Wu areas, adding characteristics to the lexicon of Northern Wu, traces of which can still be found in Northern Wu varieties today.[8]

During the time between Ming Dynasty and early Republican era, the main characteristics of modern Wu were formed. The Suzhou dialect became the most influential, and many dialectologists use it in citing examples of Wu.

During the Ming dynasty Wu speakers moved into Jianghuai Mandarin speaking regions, influencing the Tairu and Tongtai dialects of Jianghuai.[9]

After the Taiping Rebellion at the end of the Qing dynasty, in which the Wu-speaking region was devastated by war, Shanghai was inundated with migrants from other parts of the Wu-speaking area. This greatly affected the dialect of Shanghai, bringing, for example, influence from the Ningbo dialect to a dialect which, at least within the walled city of Shanghai, was almost identical to the Suzhou dialect. As a result of the population boom, in the first half of the 20th century, Shanghainese became almost a regional lingua franca within the region eclipsing the status of the Suzhou dialect. However due to its pastiche of features from different languages, it is rarely used to infer historical information about the Wu dialect family and is less representative of Wu than the Suzhou dialect.

Post-1949

After the founding of the People's Republic of China, the strong promotion of Mandarin in the Wu-speaking region yet again influenced the development of the language. Wu was gradually excluded from most modern media and schools. Public organizations were required to use Mandarin. With the influx of a migrant non Wu-speaking population, the near total conversion of public media and organizations to the exclusive use of Mandarin as well as radical Mandarin promotion measures, the modernization and standardization of or literacy in Wu dialects became improbable and left them more prone to Mandarinization. The promotion measures, which at present mostly consist of signs like the one pictured, are primarily aimed at limiting the usage of dialect in conducting public or administrative affairs though it, like the smoking ban, is commonly violated and it's not so uncommon to hear people speaking dialect in a government office or a bank. The usage of dialect in all other spheres is officially tolerated. Standardization of dialects however may be perceived as a precursor to possible regionalism, so this too would most likely be deterred. On the other hand, few speakers consider their dialect important enough to be written or standardized. To most speakers, dialects are in essence a wholly oral phenomenon.

It is not uncommon to encounter children who grew up with a regional variant of Mandarin as their mother tongue with little or no fluency in a Wu variety at all.[10] However this is primarily when parents are speakers of different dialects and communicate in Mandarin and more rarely due to the parents' attitudes towards using dialect which most associate with the warmth of home and family life. Many people have noticed this trend and thus call for preservation and documentation of not only Wu but all Chinese dialects. The first major attempt was the Linguistic Atlas of Chinese Dialects/汉语方言地图集 which surveyed 2,791 locations across the nation including 121 Wu locations (a step up from the two locations in PKU's earlier surveys) and led to the formation of an elaborate database including digital recordings of all locations[11] which is unfortunately not available to the general public. The atlas's editor Cao Zhiyun considers many of these dialects "endangered" and has introduced the term 濒危方言 bīnwēi fāngyán or endangered dialects into the Chinese language to arouse people's attention to the issue,[12] while others try to draw attention to how the dialects' fall under the scope of UNESCO's intangible cultural heritage and as such deserve to be preserved and respected.

More TV programs are appearing in Wu varieties, and nearly every town has at least one show in their dialect. They are however no longer permitted to air during prime time.[13] They are generally more playful than serious, and the majority of these shows, such as Hangzhou's 阿六头说新闻 "Old Liutou tells you the news", provide local or regional news in the dialect, but most are limited to fifteen minutes of airtime. Popular video sites such as youku and tudou also host a variety of user-uploaded audio and visual media in many Wu dialects most of which are dialectal TV shows though some are user-created songs and the like. A number of popular books are also appearing to teach people how to speak the Shanghai, Suzhou, and Wenzhou dialects, but they are clearly more playful and entertaining than serious attempts at promoting literacy or standardization.

Jianghuai Mandarin has replaced Wu dialect as the language of multiple counties in Jiangsu. An example of this is Zaicheng Town in Lishui County, both Jianghuai and Wu dialect were spoken in several towns in Lishui, with Wu being spoken by the greater amount of people in more towns than Jianghuai. The Wu dialect is called "old Zaicheng Speech", while the Jianghuai dialect is called "new Zaicheng speech", with Wu dialect being driven rapidly to extinction. Only old people use it to talk to relatives. The Jianghuai dialect was present there since about a century, even though all the surrounding areas around the town are Wu speaking. Jianghuai was always confined inside the town itself until the 60's, in the present it is overtaking Wu.[14]

Number of speakers

Wu Chinese was once historically dominant north of the Yangtze River and most of what is now Anhui province during the Sui dynasty. Its strength in areas north of the Yangtze vastly declined since the late Tang dynasty until the late Ming dynasty, when the first characteristics of Early Modern Wu were formed. During the early Qing period, Wu speakers represented about 20% of the whole Chinese population. This number soon decreased since after the Taiping Rebellion and eventually less than 5% in 1984.[15]

The diachronic study of Wu

There has been considerable attention drawn to the diachronic study of Wu,[16] especially since the massive disruptions of the previous two centuries and the implementation of Mandarin have likely left an indelible mark on many dialects. This has lead many historical linguists and dialectologists to wonder what the dialects would be like if they had continued to develop in isolation. The attention towards hypothetical ancestral forms can be viewed with some scrutiny, since language in general is always prone to exterior influences. Whether a dialect is considered pure or authentic is mostly a matter of taste. Chinese dialects continually interact and influence each other regardless of whether it is a forcibly imposed official dialect or a neighboring one. Indeed, diglossia is the norm throughout most of the world, so it’s only natural that such contact would influence both.

Origins

Wu is sometimes considered to be one of the first or most ancient dialects, since the region was the first one settled which was non-contiguous with the other Chinese states. Proto-Wu or Old Wu-Min is also the language from which the Min dialects evolved as the populace migrated farther south, so some knowledge of this language would not only offer insight into the development of these dialects and Sino-Tibetan but also into the indigenous languages of the region knowledge of which would also be invaluable towards establishing the phylogeny of related Asian languages and towards reconstructing them.

History has it that the family of the Duke of Wu (Chinese: 吳太伯; pinyin: Wú tàibó) settled in the area during the Spring and Autumn period bringing along a large section of the population and Chinese administrative practices along with them forming the state of Wu.[17] One can only guess at the linguistic situation of the time. The state of Wu could have been ruled by a Chinese minority along with sinified Yue peoples, and the bulk of the population would have remained Yue until later migrations and absorption into the greater Chinese populace (though many likely fled south as well). Many have wondered about what effect the Yue people's language may have had on the dialect spoken there, since for example names and other social practices in the state of Yue are markedly different from the rest of Chinese civilization.[18]

Karlgren on the other hand notes that the Tang koine was adopted by most speakers in China (except for those in Fujian) with only slight remnants of “vulgar” speech from pre-Tang times which he believed were preserved among the lower classes,[19] albeit this makes many presumptions about Tang China’s class structure and sociolinguistic situation. Most linguists today refer to these remnants as dialectal strata or substrata. Karlgren's basic idea about the impact of the Tang koine is clearly undeniable, and in many ways the koine can be considered the language from which Wu dialects evolved with the earlier language leaving behind a pre-Tang dialectal stratum which itself may have included a substratum from the Yue language(s).

Western dialectologists have found a small handful of words which appear to be part of an Austroasiatic substratum in many Wu and Min dialects. Indeed Mandarin Chinese also possesses some words of Austroasiatic origin such as the original name of the Yangtze river 江 jiāng (Old Chinese *krung compared to Old Vietnamese *krong) which has evolved into the word for river.[20] Min dialects, which were less affected by the koine, definitely appear to possess an Austroasiatic substratum, such as a Min word for shaman or spirit healer such as in Jian’ou Min toŋ³ which appears to be cognate with Vietnames ʔdoŋ², Written Mon doŋ, and Santali dōŋ which all have meanings similar to the Min word.[21]

The most notable examples are the word for person in some Wu varieties as *nong usually written as 儂 nóng in Chinese and the word for wet in many Wu and Min dialects with a /t/ initial which is clearly in no way related to the Chinese word 濕 shī but cognate with Vietnamese đầm. Min dialects notably retain the bilabial nasal coda for this word.

Analysis of the work Song of the Yue Boatman (Chinese: 越人歌; pinyin: Yuèrén Gē), a song in the Yue language transcribed by a Chinese official in Chinese characters, clearly points to a Tai language rather than an Austroasiatic one.[22] Chinese discussion of Wenzhounese often mentions the strong Tai affinities the dialect possesses.[23] The Zhuang languages in Guangxi for example are also Tai, so it would appear that both Tai and Austroasiatic speakers populated southern China before the Chinese expansion. The term Yue was clearly applied indiscriminately to any non-Chinese in the area which the Chinese encountered. The impact of these languages still appears to be fairly minimal overall.

Though Sino-Tibetan, Tai–Kadai, and Austroasiatic are mostly considered to be unrelated to each other, Laurent Sagart has proposed some possible phylogenetic affinities. Specifically, Tai–Kadai and Sino-Tibetan could possibly both belong to the Austronesian language family (not to be confused with Austroasiatic) due to a scattering of cognates between their ancestral forms, and there is also some, albeit much more tenuous, evidence to suggest that Austroasiatic should also be included, however his views are but one among competing hypotheses about the phylogeny of these languages, see the Sino-Austronesian languages article for some further detail.

It does appear that Wu dialects have had non-Sinitic influences, and many contain words cognate with those of other languages in various strata. These words however are few and far between, and Wu on the whole is most strongly influenced by Tang Chinese rather than any other linguistic influence.

Written sources

There are few written sources of study for Wu, and research is generally concentrated on modern speech forms rather than texts. Written Chinese has always been in the classical form, so Wu speakers would have written in this classical form and read it in a literary form of their dialect based on the phonetic distinctions outlined in rhyme dictionaries. So any text in classical Chinese from the region is not going to give a clear notion about the actual speech of the writer, although there may have been cleverly disguised puns based on local pronunciations which are lost on modern readers or other dialect speakers. Shaoxing opera for example is performed in the Shaoxing dialect, however the register is more literary than oral.

There are still however a number of primary documents available, albeit they do not always give a clear sense of the dialects' historical pronunciation. They do often offer insight into lexical differences. Most of the sources for diachronic Wu study lie in the folk literature of the region. Since the average person was illiterate and the literate were often traditionalists who possibly perceived their local form of Chinese as a degenerated version of a classical ideal, as a result very little was recorded although local vocabulary often sneaks into written records.

The main sources of study are from the Ming and Qing period, since the dialectal differences were not as obvious until Ming times,[24] and lie in historical folk songs, tanci (Chinese: 彈詞; pinyin: táncí, a kind of ballad or lyric poem), local records, legendary stories, baihua novels, educational material produced for the region, notes which have survived among individuals' effects, the linguistic descriptions made by foreigners (primarily by missionaries), and the bibles translated into Wu dialects. These all give glimpses into the past, but except for the bibles, are not so useful for phonological studies. They are however of tremendous importance for diachronic studies of vocabulary and to a lesser extent grammar and syntax.

Ming and Qing Wu

The diachronic study of written Ming and Qing Wu, the time when the dialects began to take on wholly unique features, can be placed into three stages: the Early Period, the Middle Period, and the Late Period.

These works contain a small handful of unique grammatical features some of which are not found in contemporary Mandarin, classical Chinese, or in contemporary Wu dialects. They do contain many of the unique features present in contemporary Wu such as pronouns, but clearly indicate that not all of the earlier unique features of these Wu dialects were carried into the present. These works also possess a number of characters uniquely formed to express features not found in the classical language as well as used some common characters used as phonetic loans (see Chinese character classification) to express other uniquely Wu vocabulary.

Wu-speaking writers who wrote in vernacular Mandarin often left traces of their native varieties in their works, as for example can be found in 官場現形記 and 负曝闲谈.

Another source from this period is from the work of the missionary Joseph Edkins who gathered prolific amounts of data and published several educational works on Shanghainese as well as a bible in Shanghainese and a few other major Wu varieties.

Works in this period also saw an explosion of new vocabulary in Wu dialects to describe their ever changing world. This clearly reflects the great social changes which were occurring during the time.[25]

Further reading

There are currently three works available on the topic:

Classification

Wu's place within the greater scope of Sinitic varieties is less easily typified than protoypically northern Chinese such as Mandarin or prototypically southern Chinese such as Cantonese which are the two main subgroups of Chinese. Its original classification, along with the other Sinitic varieties, was established in 1937 by Li Fang-Kuei whose boundaries more or less have remained the same[26] and were adopted by Yuan Jiahua in his influential 1961 dialect primer^ .

The sole basis of Li's classification was the evolution of Middle Chinese voiced stops.[26] In the original sense, a Wu dialect was by definition one which retained voiced initials. This definition is problematic considering the devoicing process which has begun in many southern Wu dialects which are surrounded by dialects which retain the ancestral voicing. The loss of voicing in a dialect does not entail that its other features are going to suddenly become dramatically different from the dialects it has had long historic ties with. It furthermore would place Old Xiang in this category. So more elaborate systems have developed, but they still mostly delineate the same regions. So regardless of the justification, the Wu region has been clearly outlined, and Li's boundary in some ways has remained the de facto standard.

In Norman's usage, Wu dialects can be considered "central dialects" or dialects which are clearly in a transition zone containing features which typify both northern and southern Chinese. .[27]

Varieties

Dialectologists traditionally establish linguistic boundaries based on several overlapping isoglosses of linguistic features. One of the critical historical factors for these boundaries lies in the movement of the population of speakers.[28] This is often determined by the administrative boundaries established during imperial times. As such, imperial boundaries are essential for delineating one dialect from another, and many dialects' isogloss clusters line up perfectly with the county boundaries established in imperial times, albeit some counties contain more than one dialect and others may span several counties.[29] Another factor which influences movement and transportation as well as the establishment of administrative boundaries is geography.[30] Northernmost Zhejiang and Jiangsu are incredibly flat, in the middle of a river delta, and as such are more uniform than the more mountainous regions farther south towards Fujian. The Taihu dialects, like Mandarin in the flat northern plains, is relatively more homogeneous than Southern Wu which has a significantly greater diversity of linguistic forms, and this is likely a direct result of their geography. Coastal dialects also share more featural affinities, likely because the East China Sea provides a means of transportation. The same phenomenon can be seen with Min dialects as well.

Wu is divided into two major groups: Northern Wu and Southern Wu, which are only partially mutually intelligible. Individual words spoken in isolation may be comprehensible among these speakers, but the flowing discourse of everyday life mostly is not. There is another lesser group Western Wu, synonymous with the Xuanzhou division, which has a larger influence from the surrounding Mandarin dialects than Northern Wu, making it typologically much different from the rest of Wu. The following are the traditional classifications of Wu, but one of China's foremost dialectologists Cao Zhiyun (Chinese: 曹志耘; pinyin: Cáo Zhìyún) has rearranged some of the divisions based on the greater corpus of data available now compared to when these divisions were made.

According to Yan (2006), Wu is divided into six dialect areas:

According to Cao,[32] Southern Wu can be divided into three broad divisions (note that he is using the pre-republican boundaries for the cited locations).

Phonology

The Wu dialects are notable among Chinese languages in having kept the "muddy" (voiced, or more precisely slack voiced) plosives and fricatives of Middle Chinese, such as /b̥/, /d̥/, /ɡ̊/, /z̥/, /v̥/, etc., thus maintaining the three-way contrast of Middle Chinese stop consonants and affricates, /p pʰ b̥/, /tɕ tɕʰ d̥ʑ̊/, etc.[33] (For example, 「凍 痛 洞」 /t tʰ d̥/, where other varieties have only /t tʰ/.) Because Wu dialects never lost these voiced obstruents, the tone split of Middle Chinese is still allophonic, and most dialects have three syllabic tones (though counted as eight in traditional descriptions). In Shanghai, these are reduced to two word tones.

See Suzhou dialect, Hangzhou dialect, Changzhou dialect, Shanghainese, Quzhou dialect, Jiangshan dialect and Wenzhounese for examples of Wu phonology.

Literary and vernacular pronunciations in Shanghainese

Pinyin English translation Literary Vernacular
jiā house tɕia˥˨ ka˥˨
yán face ɦiɪ˩˩˧ ŋʱɛ˩˩˧
yīng cherry ʔiŋ˥˨ ʔã˥˨
xiào filial piety ɕiɔ˧˧˥ hɔ˧˧˥
xué learning ʱjaʔ˨ ʱoʔ˨
thing vəʔ˨ mʱəʔ˨
wǎng web ʱwɑŋ˩˩˧ mʱɑŋ˩˩˧
fèng male phoenix voŋ˩˩˧ boŋ˩˩˧
féi fat vi˩˩˧ bi˩˩˧
sun zəʔ˨ ɳʱiɪʔ˨
rén person zən˩˩˧ ɳʱin˩˩˧
niǎo bird ʔɳiɔ˧˧˥ tiɔ˧˧˥

Grammar

The pronoun systems of many Wu dialects is complex when it comes to personal and demonstrative pronouns. For example, the first person plural pronoun differs when it is inclusive (including the hearer) and when it is exclusive (excluding the hearer, such as "me and him/her/them not you"). Wu employs six demonstratives, three of which are used to refer to close objects, and three of which are used for farther objects . In terms of word order, Wu uses SVO (like Mandarin), but unlike Mandarin, it also has a high occurrence of SOV and in some cases OSV[34][35]

In terms of phonology, tone sandhi is extremely complex, and helps parse multisyllabic words and idiomatic phrases. In some cases, indirect objects are distinguished from direct objects by a voiced/voiceless distinction.

In most cases, classifiers take the place of genitive particles and articles – a quality shared with Cantonese – as shown by the following examples:

Wu Wu translation Mandarin Mandarin translation
本書交關好看 the volume [of] book is good 書很好看 the book is very good
我支筆 my stick [of] pen 我的筆 my pen
渠碗粥 his bowl [of] congee 他的粥 his congee

Common words and phrases in Wu

Note: The examples are in Shanghainese. IPA transcription is for the Middle period of modern Shanghainese (中派上海话).

Translation IPA Chinese character
Shanghainese (people) [zɑ̃.ˈhe.ɲɪɲ] 上海人
I [ŋu]
we or I [ŋu.ɲi] or [ɐˑ.lɐʔ] 我伲、阿拉(我拉)
he/she [ɦi] 渠(伊, 其)
they [ɦi.la] 渠拉(伊拉)
you (sing.) [noŋ] (儂)
you (plural) [na]
hello [noŋ hɔ] 侬好(儂好)
good-bye [ˈtse.ɦue] 再会(再會)
thank you [ʑ̻iaja noŋ] or [ʑ̻iaʑ̻ia noŋ] 谢谢侬(謝謝儂)
sorry [te.vəˑ.tɕʰi] 对勿起(對勿起)
but, however [dɛ.zɨ], [dɛ.zɨ.ni] 但是, 但是呢
please [tɕʰɪɲ] (請)
that one [ˈe.tsɐʔ], [i.tsɐʔ] 哎只, 伊只
this one [ɡəʔ.tsɐʔ] 搿只
there [ˈe.tɐʔ], [i.tɐʔ] 哎垯, 伊垯
over there [ˈe.mi.tɐʔ], [i.mi.tɐʔ] 哎面垯, 伊面垯
here [ɡəˑ.tɐʔ] 搿垯(箇垯)
to have [ɦiɤɯ.təʔ] 有得
to exist, here, present [lɐˑ.he] 勒許
now, current [ɦi.ze] 现在(現在)
what time is it? [ɦi.ze tɕi.ti tsoŋ] 搿息几点钟?(搿息幾點鐘?)
where [ɦa.ɺi.tɐʔ], [sa.di.fɑ̃] 嚡里垯(嚡裏垯), 啥地方
what [sa ɦəʔ] 啥个, 做啥
who [sa.ɲɪɲ] or [ɦa.ɺi.ɦue] 啥人, 嚡里位
why [ɦue.sa] 为啥(為啥)
when [sa.zəɲ.kuɑ̃] 啥辰光
how [na.nəɲ, na.nəɲ.ka] 哪恁, 哪恁介
how much? [tɕi.di] 几钿?几块洋钿?(幾鈿?幾塊銀頭?)
yes [ˈe]
no [m̩], [vəˑ.zɨ], [m̩məʔ], [viɔ] 呒, 弗是, 呒没
telephone number [di.ɦʊ ɦɔ.dɤɯ] 电话号头(電話號頭)
home [oˑ.ɺi.ɕiã] 屋里向(屋裏向)
Come to our house and play. [tɔ ɐˑ.lɐʔ oˑ.ɺi.ɕiɑ̃ le bəˑ.ɕiã] 到阿拉屋里厢来孛相(白相)!(到阿拉屋裏厢來孛相!)
Where's the restroom? [da.sɤɯ.kɛ ɺəˑ.ɺɐʔ ɦa.ɺi.tɐʔ] 汏手间勒勒嚡里垯?(汏手間勒勒嚡裏垯?)
Have you eaten dinner? [ɦia.vɛ tɕʰɪˑ.ku.ləʔ va] 夜饭吃过了𠲎?(夜飯吃過了𠲎?)
I don't know [ŋɯ; vəˑ.ɕiɔ.təʔ] 我弗(勿)晓得.(我弗(勿)曉得.)
Do you speak English? [noŋ ˈɪn.vəɲ kãtəʔle va] 侬英文讲得来𠲎?
I love you [ŋɯ; e noŋ] 我爱侬!(我愛儂!)
I adore you [ŋɯ; e.mɯ noŋ] 我爱慕侬.(我愛慕儂!)
I like you a lot [ŋɯ; ɺɔ ˈhuø.ɕi noŋ ɦəʔ] 我老欢喜侬搿!(我老歡喜儂搿)
news [ɕɪɲ.vəɲ] 新闻(新聞)
dead [ɕi.tʰəˑ.ləʔ] 死脱了
alive [ɦuəˑ.lɐˑ.he] 活勒嗨(活着)
a lot [ˈtɕiɔ.kue] 交关(邪气)
inside, within [ɺi.ɕiã] 里向
outside [ŋa.dɤɯ] 外頭
How are you? [noŋ hɔ va]? 侬好伐?(儂好伐?)

Examples

Shanghainese IPA Literal meaning Actual meaning
其 勒 門口頭 立 勒許。 [ɦi le məŋ.kʰɤɯ.dɤɯ lɪʔ lɐˑ.he] (third person) (past participle) doorway (particle) stand existed He was standing at the door.

Vocabulary

Like other varieties of Southern Chinese, Wu Chinese retains some archaic vocabulary from Classical Chinese, Middle Chinese, and Old Chinese.

Examples

Mandarin equivalents and their pronunciation on Wu Chinese are in parentheses. All IPA transcriptions and examples listed below are from Shanghainese.
「許」(那) [he] (na) (particle)
「汏」(洗) [da] (si) to wash
「囥」(藏) [kɔŋ] (zɔŋ) to hide something
「隑」(斜靠) [ɡe] (ʑ̊ia kʰɔ) to lean
「廿」(二十) [ne] (əl sɐʔ) twenty (The Mandarin equivalent, 二十, is also used to a lesser extent, mostly in its literary pronunciation.)
「弗」/「勿」(不) [və] (pʰə) no, not
「立」(站) [liɪʔ] (ze) to stand
「囡」 [nø] child, whelp (It is pronounced as nān in Mandarin.)
「睏」(睡) [kʰwəŋ] (zø) to sleep
「尋」(找) [ʑ̊iɲ] (tsɔ) to find
「戇」 [ɡɔɲ] foolish, stupid. (It is a cognate of the Min word 歞, which is ngâung [ŋɑuŋ˨˦˨] in Fuzhou dialect and gōng [koŋ˧] in Min Nan.)
「揎」 [ɕyø] to strike (a person)
「逐」(追) [zoʔ] or [tsoʔ] (tsø) to chase
「焐」 [u] to make warm, to warm up (ex. 焐焐熱)
「肯」 [kʰəɲ] to permit, to allow
「事體」 [z̥z tʰi] thing (business, affair, matter)
「歡喜」 [hø ɕi] to like, to be keen on something, to be fond of, to love
「物事」 [məʔ z̥z̩] things (more specifically, material things)

In Wu dialects, the morphology of the words are similar, but the characters are switched around. Not all Wu Chinese words exhibit this phenomenon, only some words in some dialects.

Preference of archaic words

Like other varieties of Southern Chinese, Wu prefers more archaic words to 'to speak'. For example:

In most Wu dialects, with the exception of Hangzhou dialect, 講 [ɡɔŋ] is preferred when referring to speaking rather than the Mandarin shuō 說 [sɐʔ]. In Guangfeng and Yushan counties of Jiangxi province, 曰 [je] is generally preferred over 說. In Shangrao county of Jiangxi province, 話 [wa] is preferred over 說.

Colloquialisms

In Wu Chinese, there are colloquialisms that are traced back to ancestral Chinese varieties, such as Middle or Old Chinese. Many of those colloquialisms are cognates of other words found in other modern southern Chinese dialects, such as Gan, Xiang, or Min.

Mandarin equivalents and their pronunciation on Wu Chinese are in parentheses. All IPA transcriptions and examples listed below are from Shanghainese.

「鑊子」 (鍋子) [ɦɔʔ tsɨ] (ɡu tsɨ) wok, cooking pot. The Mandarin equivalent term is also used, but both of them are synonyms and are thus interchangeable.
「衣裳」 (衣服) [i zã] (i voʔ) clothing. Found in other Chinese dialects. It is a reference to traditional Han Chinese clothing, where it consists of the upper garments 「衣」 and the lower garments 「裳」.

See also

China portal
Language portal

References

  1. ^ Wu Chinese at Ethnologue
  2. ^ http://www.greentranslations.com/wu-language
  3. ^ http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/649855/Wu-language
  4. ^ 蒋冰冰 (2003). 吴语宣州片方言音韵研究. Shanghai: 华东师范大学出版社. pp. 1. ISBN 7-5617-3299-6. 
  5. ^ Starostin, Sergei (2009). Reconstruction of Old Chinese Phonology. Shanghai: 上海教育出版社. pp. 3. ISBN 978-7-5444-2616-9. 
  6. ^ Maria Kurpaska (2010). Chinese language(s): a look through the prism of The great dictionary of modern Chinese dialects. Volume 215 of Trends in linguistics: Studies and monographs (illustrated ed.). Walter de Gruyter. p. 161. ISBN 311021914X. http://books.google.com/books?id=lCgnrA7Ke3QC&pg=PA61&dq=jianghuai+mandarin&hl=en&ei=foh_TqHMN8nf0QHdot3bDw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7&ved=0CE0Q6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=jianghuai%20mandarin%20%20nanjing%20eastern%20jin&f=false. Retrieved 23 September 2011. 
  7. ^ W. South Coblin (1983). A handbook of Eastern Han sound glosses. Chinese University Press. p. 25. ISBN 9622012582. http://books.google.com/books?id=LoOYvmYeutsC&pg=PA25&dq=Information+on+the+southeastern+dialects+of+FY+is+virtually+non-existent+in+the+post+FY/SW+materials.+They+correspond+to+the+Wu+%5E+or+Jiangdong+'(L'W.+dialects+of+the+WJ+period,+which,+in+the+time+of+the+commentator+Guo+Pu+?&hl=en&ei=nd2cToDLC-fh0QHRp4CMCQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CC0Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Information%20on%20the%20southeastern%20dialects%20of%20FY%20is%20virtually%20non-existent%20in%20the%20post%20FY%2FSW%20materials.%20They%20correspond%20to%20the%20Wu%20%5E%20or%20Jiangdong%20'(L'W.%20dialects%20of%20the%20WJ%20period%2C%20which%2C%20in%20the%20time%20of%20the%20commentator%20Guo%20Pu%20%3F&f=false. Retrieved 23 September 2011. "Information on the southeastern dialects of FY is virtually non-existent in the post FY/SW materials. They correspond to the Wu ^ or Jiangdong '(L'W. dialects of the WJ period, which, in the time of the commentator Guo Pu 郭璞; (276–324), were still felt to be quite different from the speech of other areas." 
  8. ^ University of London. School of Oriental and African Studies (2002). Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, Volume 65. The School. p. 540. http://books.google.com/books?ei=lUebTqJCpq_QAfyAwd8E&ct=result&id=UhYLAQAAMAAJ&dq=Jiangdong+%28the+south-eastern+group+of+Han+times%29+and+a+more+westerly+type+called+JTng-Ba+%28the+Han-time+southern+group&q=jiangdong. Retrieved 23 September 2011. "On top of this lies the main corpus of Wu lexical material, reflecting immigration from the north in the fourth and fifth centuries. Within this layer we then find in the Northern Wu area unique features apparently reflecting mid-to"  (the University of Michigan)
  9. ^ University of London. School of Oriental and African Studies (2002). Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, Volume 65. The School. p. 541. http://books.google.com/books?ei=KzebTrbBN6Lb0QGcyNmeAg&ct=result&id=Uz8qAQAAIAAJ&dq=For+example%2C+the+eastern-most+languages+of+the+Tairu+or+Tongtai+branch+saw+significant+immigration+from+Wu-speaking+areas+in+early+Ming+times%2C+while+in+the+same+period+the+Huang-Xiao+area+on+the+western+flank+of+the+family+was+inundated&q=tairu+tongtai+branch+immigration+ming. Retrieved 23 September 2011. "For example, the eastern-most languages of the Tairu or Tongtai branch saw significant immigration from Wu-speaking areas in early Ming times, while in the same period the Huang-Xiao area on the western flank of the family was inundated"  (the University of Michigan)
  10. ^ http://www.answers.com/topic/chinese-language
  11. ^ 曹志耘 (2008). Linguistic Atlas of Chinese Dialects 3 vol.. Beijing: The Commercial Press. ISBN 978-7-100-05774-5. 
  12. ^ 曹志耘 (2008). 汉语语言文字学论丛:方言卷. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press. pp. 39. 
  13. ^ Song, Wei (14 Jan 2011). "Dialects to be phased out of prime time TV". China Daily. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2011-01/14/content_11854199.htm. Retrieved 29 May 2011. 
  14. ^ Journal of Asian Pacific communication, Volume 16, Issues 1-2. Multilingual Matters. 2006. p. 336. http://books.google.com/books?ei=jIWCTuzzJojI0AGPq4GwAQ&ct=result&id=2d9mAAAAMAAJ&dq=The+former+is+a+variety+of+Wu+Dialect%2C+and+the+latter+a+Jiang-Huai+Mandarin+Dialect.+The+old+dialect+is+disappearing.+Its+speakers%2C+a+minority+of+elders%2C+use+the+variety+only+among+family+members.+According+to+some+interviewees+over&q=zaicheng. Retrieved 23 September 2011.  (the University of Michigan)
  15. ^ http://www.ethnologue.com/show_language.asp?code=wuu
  16. ^ Ballard, William (1989). "Pig, Tone Sandhi and Wumin". Cahiers de linguistique - Asie 18 (2). 
  17. ^ 袁家骅 (2006). 汉语方言概要. Beijing: 语文出版社. pp. 55. ISBN 7-80126-474-6/H・106. 
  18. ^ Henry, Eric (May 2007). "The Submerged History of Yuè". Sino-Platonic Papers 176. http://www.sino-platonic.org/complete/spp176_history_of_yue.html. 
  19. ^ Norman, Jerry L.; W. South Coblin (Oct-Dec. 1995). "A New Approach to Chinese Historical Linguistics". Journal of the American Oriental Society 115 (4): 576. 
  20. ^ Jerry Norman (1988/2008). Chinese. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 18. ISBN 978-0-521-29653-3. 
  21. ^ Jerry Norman (1988/2008). Chinese. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 18–19. ISBN 978-0-521-29653-3. 
  22. ^ Edmondson, Jerold A.. "The power of language over the past: Tai settlement and Tai linguistics in southern China and northern Vietnam". Studies in Southeast Asian languages and linguistics. http://ling.uta.edu/~jerry/pol.pdf. 
  23. ^ 游汝杰 (March 1999). "Some special grammatical features of the Wenzhou dialect and their corresponding forms in Tai languages (1998)". 游汝杰自选集 (Guilin): 227–245. ISBN 7-5633-2773-8. 
  24. ^ 石汝杰 (2006). 明清吴语和现代方言研究. Shanghai: 上海辞书出版社. pp. 141. ISBN 7-5326-2162-6/H.298. 
  25. ^ 石汝杰 (2006). 明清吴语和现代方言研究. Shanghai: 上海辞书出版社. pp. 141–9. ISBN 7-5326-2162-6/H.298. 
  26. ^ a b Jerry Norman (1988/2008). Chinese. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 180. ISBN 978-0-521-29653-3. 
  27. ^ Jerry Norman (1988/2008). Chinese. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 197–8. ISBN 978-0-521-29653-3. 
  28. ^ 王文胜 (2008). 处州方言的地理语言学研究. Beijing: 中国社会科学出版社. pp. 142. ISBN 010-84029450. 
  29. ^ Yuen Ren Society. "How many Chinese dialects are there, anyway?". http://www.oocities.org/yuenrensociety/howmanydialects.html. Retrieved 12 June 2011. 
  30. ^ 王文胜 (2008). 处州方言的地理语言学研究. Beijing: 中国社会科学出版社. pp. 148. ISBN 010-84029450. 
  31. ^ http://globalrecordings.net/langcode/wuu
  32. ^ 曹志耘 (2002). 南部吴语语音研究. Beijing: The Commercial Press. pp. 2, 5. ISBN 7-100-03533-3. 
  33. ^ Yan (2006)
  34. ^ [1]
  35. ^ The Sino-Tibetan Languages by Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla, p.94

Notes

External links

Resources on Wu dialects

A BBS set up in 2004, in which topics such as phonology, grammar, orthography and romanization of Wu Chinese are widely talked about. The cultural and linguistic diversity within China is also a significant concerning of this forum.

A website aimed at modernization of Wu Chinese, including basics of Wu, Wu romanization scheme, pronunciation dictionaries of different dialects, Wu input method development, Wu research literatures, written Wu experiment, Wu orthography, a discussion forum etc.

Excellent reference on Wu Chinese, including tones of the sub-dialects.

Articles